Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:12
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Xbox finally reveals handheld console after decade of speculation - BBC
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
How do I rat my boss out for serial cheating on his wife?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump White House opens door to historic military deployment on U.S. soil - The Washington Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why are perceived or real slights interpreted as rejections and reality by pwBPD?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Where did the false claim that Haitian immigrants are eating pets come from?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.